Comparative Postcolonialism in the Works of V.S. Naipaul and Toni Morrison: Fragmented Identitiesbegins with an overview of its theoretical framework, highlighting the intersectional relationship between postcolonial literature and comparative literature. Tracing selected novels by Naipaul and Morrison, the book takes, as a starting point, Fanons three-phase journey of the decolonizing process. In the first phase of mimicry, Naipauls and Morrisons earlier novels represent the assimilation of indigenous people into dominant hegemonic cultures. The second phase is envisioned as the re-narration or re-interpretation of the past and old legends of indigenous culture. Morrison succeeds in asserting that her ancestors past is the only way to celebrate a cultural identity, but Naipaul tends to criticize and neglect his past and his original, indigenous culture. The third phase marks the emergence of a revolutionary literature, in which Naipaul and Morrison guide their people to hybridity as a new way of becoming and resisting the hegemonic dichotomies in dominant societies.

Alshaymaa Mohamed Ahmedis assistant professor of English and comparative literature in the humanities department, College of Language and Communication, Arab Academy for Science Technology and Maritime, (AAST) Cairo, Egypt.

Acknowledgements

Introduction

Chapter One: Postcolonial Literature and Comparative Literature

Chapter Two: Mimicry and Fragmented Identities in V.S. NaipaulsThe Mimic Men and Toni MorrisonsThe Bluest Eye

Chapter Three: Memory as a Reflection of Cultural Identity in V.S. NaipaulsThe Enigma of Arrival and Toni MorrisonsBeloved

Chapter Four: A Journey from Unhomeliness to Hybridity in V.S. NaipaulsHalf a Life andMagic Seeds and Toni MorrisonsHome

Chapter Five: Gender in Naipaul and Morrison

Chapter Six: Naipaul and Morrison: Some Conclusions and New Comparative Outlooks

Bibliography

About the Author